Loading…
This event has ended. View the official site or create your own event → Check it out
This event has ended. Create your own
Learn More  |  Register  |  Sponsor  |  Join Mailing List  |  Follow Us on Twitter

Pre-conference Workshops: Wednesday, March 22 & Thursday, March 23, 2017
Main Conference: Friday, March 24 - Sunday, March 26, 2017 
View analytic
Saturday, March 25 • 2:15pm - 3:00pm
Taxonomic Irony or: What I Think about When I Think about Taxonomies (Including a Meta-Taxonomy)

Sign up or log in to save this to your schedule and see who's attending!

Feedback form is now closed.
When I talk to Information Architects about taxonomies it often seems that we're not talking about the same thing(s)--which, given the goal of vocabulary control, is pretty ironic.

It turns out that organizing pages on a website for navigation and organizing hundreds of thousands of pieces of content for discovery are deeply related but extraordinarily different activities; this suggests that different demands (e.g., construction and design strategies) are required for each.

Increasingly, though, IAs are required/assumed to have competency across the various types of taxonomies, including those (until recently) primarily in the purview of library and information science.

In this high-level talk I suggest that there are, broadly speaking, three types of taxonomies:

-Taxonomies for Website Navigation tend to be small, user-centric, and fairly shallow;

-Taxonomies for E-commerce tend to be larger, feature polyhierarchy and synonymy, and tend towards enabling filtering and recursive search (perhaps thesauri or ontologies);

-Taxonomies to Organize Large Volumes of Content tend to be large-to-enormous in scope, not necessarily organized for browsing, and constructed with an eye towards automatic text categorization (almost certainly thesauri and maybe ontologies);

... each of which come with different strategies for construction, implementation, and user interaction.

Naturally, there is some overlap between categories (otherwise what fun would it be?).

Although conceptual in nature the talk includes practical take-aways for taxonomy construction.

Topics include top-down versus bottom-up approaches, user and/or SME input, options for structural types and term formation, using existing vocabularies to jump-start projects, and automatic text processing techniques.

Speakers
avatar for Bob Kasenchak

Bob Kasenchak

Director of Business Development, Access Innovations
Bob Kasenchak is the Director of Business Development at Access Innovations -- a boutique metadata shop specializing in bespoke taxonomy construction. Bob has led taxonomy development and other projects for JSTOR, McGraw-Hill, Wolters Kluwer, the American Society for Civil Engineering (ASCE), Engineering Research Education (ERE), American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Thesaurus (MSHT). Bob... Read More →


Saturday March 25, 2017 2:15pm - 3:00pm
Regency C